Vijay Mallya gets bankruptcy reprieve from UK High Court

Published: April 10, 2020 4:04:01 pm

Vijay Mallya, Vijay Mallya ED, Vijay Mallya firms, Vijay Mallya companies, Vijay Mallya shell companies, Vijay Mallya case, Indian ExpressLiquor baron Vijay Mallya

In aid to liquor baron Vijay Mallya, the High Court in London has deferred hearings on a plea by the SBI-led consortium of Indian banks, looking for the indebted tycoon to be declared bankrupt to allow them to recuperate a mortgage of around 1.145 billion kilos from him.

Justice Michael Briggs of the insolvency division of the High Court granted aid to Mallya, ruling that he needs to be given time until his petitions to the Supreme Court of India and his settlement proposal earlier than the Karnataka High Court be decidedpermitting him time to repay his money owed to the banks in full.

Chief Insolvency and Company Court decide Briggs, in his verdict delivered Thursday, mentioned there isn’t any apparent benefit to the banks to pursue this class motion at this cut-off date.

“This bankruptcy petition is by any measure extraordinary. The banks are pressing for a bankruptcy order at a time when there are extant proceedings in India,” learn the judgment.

“In my judgment, the banks are secured, at least in part. The hearing of the petition should be adjourned for the purpose of amendment and for time to pay the debts in full,” it famous.

A consortium of Indian public sector banks led by the State Bank of India had sought a bankruptcy order towards Mallya as a part of efforts to recoup around GBP 1.145 billion of unpaid loans from Mallya.

Judge Briggs had reserved his judgment after listening to arguments from either side in December final yr over the loans to Mallya’s now-defunct Kingfisher Airlines.

In his judgment, the decision concluded that the authorized circumstances being pursued by Mallya in India stood an inexpensive prospect of success.

“Although the petition to the Supreme Court and proposal before the Karnataka High Court is not guaranteed to succeed, they are genuine. The evidence supports the view that the petitions stand a reasonable prospect of success,” he mentioned.

According to the courtroom doc, the judgment on the bankruptcy petition was produced in December final yr and circulated in January this yr however its handing-down was adjourned for additional argument on the request of the events.

“The events agreed to a listening to after 1 June 2020. The outbreak of COVID-19 has made fixing a date unsure. In my judgment, it’s within the pursuits of the administration of justice and within the public curiosity that this judgment is handed down now,” the ruling famous.

While the banks had argued for a bankruptcy order to make sure they obtain what’s owed to them amid a multiplicity of collectors, Mallya’s legal professionals careworn that the Indian banks had been recognized as secured collectors by Indian courts, which makes the bankruptcy petition within the UK courtroom unfair.

“Why should we take less than everything we are owed,” mentioned Marcia Shekerdemian, the barrister for the Indian banks, referring Mallya’s settlement affords.

During the listening to final yr, the courtroom had additionally heard that the banks don’t settle for the previous Kingfisher Airlines boss’ assertion that the majority of his belongings are in India and to a lesser extent worldwide.

A villa in France and belongings unfold throughout the British Virgin Islands, a belief registered within the Caribbean nation of St Kitts & Nevis and the Indian Empress superyacht in Malta had been a few of Mallya’s worldwide belongings referred to through the course of the listening to.

Mallya’s authorized group, led by barrister Philip Marshall, sought dismissal of the bankruptcy petition, arguing that their consumer was being unfairly pursued by the banks in India and the UK on reverse grounds.

“Payment has been inhibited by virtue of the intervention by the Enforcement Directorate of India, the banks are seeking a bankruptcy order against Dr. Mallya for non-payment but have created a situation where he can’t make a payment,” Marshall advised the courtroom.

An earlier UK High Court ruling had refused to overturn a worldwide order freezing Mallya’s belongings and upheld an Indian courtroom’s ruling that the consortium of 13 Indian banks had been entitled to recuperate funds amounting to just about GBP 1.145 billion.

The banks then launched efforts to recuperate dues as a part of the freezing order, with the bankruptcy petition geared toward seizing UK-based Mallya’s belongings to recuperate the dues.

Meanwhile, Mallya stays on bail pending a UK High Court ruling within the extradition proceedings introduced by India in relation to costs of fraud and cash laundering amounting to an alleged Rs 9,000 crores.